Service Tax Appeal Allowed: Production Service, Not Manpower Supply. Demand Unsustainable. Impugned Order Set Aside.

The Tribunal found that the service provided by the appellant was for production, not supply of manpower. As the department failed to establish the service as manpower supply, the demand for service tax was deemed unsustainable. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed.

---

---

Issues: Classification of service provided by the appellant as Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency service for service tax liability.

Analysis:
1. The appellant entered into a contract with a company for producing or processing goods on a per-piece basis. The department alleged the service to be Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency service, leading to a demand for service tax.
2. The appellant argued that the service provided was for production or processing, not for supplying manpower, as the job was based on per piece of goods and not on reimbursement of wages or salary. Reference was made to a tribunal decision with a similar contract, where the service was not classified as Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency service.
3. The revenue contended that the agreement submitted lacked credibility, emphasizing the nature of work as labor supply based on the agreement's terms. Reliance was placed on a Board circular for classification under Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency service.
4. The Tribunal noted the lack of conclusive evidence in the show-cause notice to classify the service as Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency service. The agreement submitted by the appellant detailed the nature of work as production, not labor supply. The Tribunal referenced a similar case with the same service recipient, where the service was not classified as manpower supply.
5. Based on the evidence presented, the Tribunal found that the service provided by the appellant was for production, not supply of manpower. As the department failed to establish the service as manpower supply, the demand for service tax was deemed unsustainable, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeals.

This detailed analysis covers the classification issue of the service provided by the appellant, highlighting the arguments presented by both sides and the Tribunal's reasoning behind the decision to set aside the demand for service tax.

---