Manufacturing scrap not subject to excise duty per Tribunal ruling

The Tribunal ruled that scrap generated during manufacturing processes is not subject to excise duty, citing a precedent from the Bombay High Court upheld by the Supreme Court. The appellants' appeal was allowed, overturning the demand for duty, interest, and penalty.

---

---

Issues involved:
The issue involved in this appeal is whether the scrap generated during the course of manufacture is liable for payment of excise duty.

Details of the judgment:
The appellants were engaged in the manufacture of boiler components and were found to have cleared scrap generated during the manufacturing process without payment of central excise duty. The investigation revealed that the appellants did fabrication work for BHEL and other companies, where the scrap generated was either used in their manufacturing activity or sold without payment of duty. The original authority confirmed the demand for duty, interest, and penalty for the period in question. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision, leading to the current appeal.

The appellants argued that the scrap generated during manufacturing is inevitable and not the intended final product, therefore not subject to excise duty. They cited legal precedents, including a decision by the Honorable Supreme Court, which held that waste and scrap generated during the manufacturing process are not exigible to excise duty. The appellants also pointed out that the appellate authority made a mistake in considering the issue related to BHEL, as it was not raised in the show cause notice.

After hearing both sides, the Tribunal referred to the decision of the Honorable Bombay High Court in a similar case, where it was held that scrap generated during manufacturing is not liable for excise duty. This decision was upheld by the Honorable Supreme Court. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the demand for duty, concluding that the scrap generated during the manufacturing process is not subject to excise duty. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if any, as per law.

---