Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether metal scrap and waste generated during repair and maintenance of machinery and plant amount to manufacture and are liable to excise duty.
Analysis: The charging provisions apply only when goods are both excisable goods and manufactured goods. A tariff entry or section note may identify the goods for classification and rate purposes, but it does not by itself deem the underlying process to be manufacture unless the statute expressly so provides. Manufacture requires a transformation resulting in a new and distinct article with a separate identity, character or use. The repair and maintenance of worn-out machinery used in cement production did not contribute to the manufacture of cement, and the scrap generated in that process was only a by-product of repair work, not a subsidiary product of the manufacturing process. The scrap therefore did not arise from manufacture in relation to the end product.
Conclusion: Metal scrap and waste arising from repair and maintenance of machinery are not the result of manufacture and are not liable to excise duty on that basis.
Final Conclusion: The demand of duty and penalty on the generated scrap could not be sustained, and the assessee succeeded in the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Excise duty is chargeable only when the goods are manufactured in the statutory sense, and a scrap or waste product generated merely from repair and maintenance, without transformation into a new and distinct marketable article, is not manufacture.