Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disallowance of loss claimed from transactions in alleged penny stock scrips was justified.
Analysis: The assessee claimed loss from trading in three scrips, but the assessment authorities treated the transactions as non-genuine on the basis of an investigation report indicating penny stock accommodation entries. The Tribunal noted that similar share transactions had been examined by the jurisdictional High Court and by coordinate benches, which had upheld the view that such transactions were bogus where the surrounding material showed they were paper transactions only. Following that binding precedent, the Tribunal found no merit in the assessee's challenge to the addition.
Conclusion: The disallowance of the claimed loss was upheld and the issue was decided against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appellate challenge to the treatment of the share-trading loss as bogus failed, and the assessment was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where share transactions in penny stock scrips are shown, on the basis of surrounding circumstances and binding precedent, to be non-genuine accommodation entries, the claimed loss can be disallowed as bogus.