Court Orders No Coercive Action Against Petitioner Until Further Notice in Show Cause and Penalty Proceedings.

The HC directed the petitioner to appear before the respondent to make submissions regarding the show cause notices and penalty proceedings. The court ordered that no coercive actions should be taken against the petitioner until further orders are issued. The writ petition was disposed of without any order as to costs, and all related miscellaneous petitions were closed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
The petitioner invoked Article 226 of the Constitution for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash show cause notices and drop penalty proceedings pending appeal.

Details of the Judgment:

Issue 1: Show Cause Notices and Penalty Proceedings
The impugned order dated 13.03.2023 issued show cause notices to the petitioner under Sections 41 and 43 of the Act, demanding penalties. The petitioner claimed ignorance about foreign investments made by his late father and had already challenged the assessment order. The petitioner requested to defer penalty proceedings until the appeal is disposed of. The petitioner argued that the notices were unwarranted as the appeal was pending, and the penalty proceedings should be deferred or dropped.

Issue 2: Response to Notices
The petitioner responded to the impugned notices in detail, offering to permit the authorities to appropriate the demanded tax dues. The petitioner's counsel requested that if the petitioner is directed to appear to answer the show cause notices, the payment of penalty should be deferred until the appeal is resolved.

Judgment
After hearing arguments from both sides, the court directed the petitioner to appear before the respondent on a specified date to make submissions. The court ordered that no coercive steps should be taken by the respondents until appropriate orders are passed. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

---