Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's request for re-assessment under Section 22(6) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 could be entertained without proof of payment of tax on the enhanced turnover, and whether the objections could thereafter be treated as an application for rectification under Section 84 of the Act.
Analysis: The proviso to Section 22(6) makes satisfactory proof of payment of admitted tax a prerequisite for entertaining an application for re-assessment. Since the petitioner's representation did not contain evidence of such payment, the deficiency had to be cured before the request could be considered. In view of the lapse of time, the petitioner was directed to remit the tax on the omitted turnover with interest, and only upon such remittance were the objections dated 22.12.2014 to be treated as an application for rectification under Section 84 and decided on merits within the stipulated time.
Conclusion: The request for re-assessment could not be entertained in its present form, but conditional relief was granted by permitting consideration of the objections as a rectification application after payment of tax and interest.