Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI • Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions • Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations • Issue-wise legal analysis • Practical arguments and supporting content • Professionally structured draft ready for further review.
Court quashes assessment order, emphasizes SOP compliance and natural justice principles. The High Court of Calcutta allowed the appeal and writ petition, quashing the assessment order dated 20th December, 2022. The Court emphasized the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The High Court of Calcutta allowed the appeal and writ petition, quashing the assessment order dated 20th December, 2022. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to the Standard Operating Procedure for faceless assessment orders and ensuring compliance with principles of natural justice in the assessment process.
Issues involved: The appeal challenges an assessment order under the Income Tax Act, 1961, alleging violation of natural justice and failure to follow the Standard Operating Procedure for faceless assessment orders.
Issue 1: Violation of principles of natural justice and SOP for faceless assessment orders
The appellant challenged the assessment order on the grounds of violation of natural justice and failure to adhere to the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for faceless assessment orders. The Single Bench had dismissed the writ petition stating that the Court cannot act as an appellate authority. The appellant contended that the challenge was not to the merits of the assessment but to the decision-making process. The SOP issued by the National Faceless Assessment Centre emphasized adherence to natural justice, reasonable opportunity to the assessee, and specified timelines for response to show cause notices. The impugned assessment order, while initially appearing to comply with the SOP, was found to be a verbatim extract of the show cause notice for a significant portion, indicating a lack of proper assessment procedure. Consequently, the Court quashed the assessment order, emphasizing that the assessing officer had reduced the procedure to an empty formality, leading to the allowance of the appeal and writ petition.
Outcome: The High Court of Calcutta, comprising Justice T.S. Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, allowed the appeal and writ petition, quashing the assessment order dated 20th December, 2022. The Court highlighted the importance of following the Standard Operating Procedure for faceless assessment orders and ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice in the assessment process.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.