Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the winding up proceedings ought to be transferred to the National Company Law Tribunal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 on the ground that no irreversible steps had been taken in the winding up process.
Analysis: The record showed that the company had been declared sick, a recommendation for winding up had already been made under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, the Official Liquidator had been appointed, claims had been invited, and substantial steps towards sale and liquidation of assets had been taken over a long period. The immovable asset was under acquisition, the movable assets had been taken over and sold, and the available assets were insufficient to meet the liabilities. In these circumstances, the winding up had progressed to an irreversible stage, and speculative possibilities of future release of acquired land did not justify transfer.
Conclusion: The request for transfer to the National Company Law Tribunal was rejected, and the finding that irreversible steps had been taken was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the order declining transfer of the winding up proceedings was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Transfer of winding up proceedings to the National Company Law Tribunal is not warranted once the liquidation process has substantially advanced and irreversible steps have been taken in relation to the company's assets and liabilities.