State's Discretion Upheld on Incentive Packages & Time Limits

The court upheld the State's discretion in customizing incentive packages and imposing a time limit on the benefit period under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Policy 2007. The petitioner's challenge to the Eligibility Certificate was dismissed due to failure to meet production targets, rendering them ineligible for incentives.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility for incentives under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Policy 2007.
2. Determination of the period for which incentives are granted.
3. Compliance with performance stipulations for availing incentives.

Summary:

Issue 1: Eligibility for incentives under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Policy 2007
The petitioner, a cement manufacturing company, challenged the incentives provided under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Policy 2007, which aims to promote investments through structured packages for eligible projects. The policy includes various incentives such as back-ended state capital subsidy, electricity tax exemption, and special subsidies for Effluent Treatment Plants (ETP) or Hazardous Waste Treatment Storage and Disposal Facilities (HWTSDF). The petitioner sought structured assistance for an investment of Rs.572 Crores in eligible fixed assets for setting up additional cement manufacturing and captive thermal power plants.

Issue 2: Determination of the period for which incentives are granted
The petitioner argued that the policy did not specify a time limit for the incentives. However, the Eligibility Certificate issued by SIPCOT limited the benefit period to five years. The petitioner contended that this ceiling was not stipulated in the original policy or G.O.Ms.No.150 dated 28.10.2010. The court noted that the policy allows the State to customize packages and that the eligibility certificate, which includes the time limit, is the final document detailing the terms and conditions specific to an application. The petitioner's request for a ten-year benefit period was also considered and rejected by the State.

Issue 3: Compliance with performance stipulations for availing incentives
The petitioner failed to achieve production above the base production volume of 65 lakhs MT, a condition necessary to avail the incentives. The court emphasized that incentives and subsidies are premised on performance, and the petitioner's inability to meet the production targets for 13 years rendered it ineligible for the incentives. The court concluded that the State's decision to impose a time limit on the benefit period was not perverse and fell outside the realm of judicial review unless proven otherwise.

Conclusion:
The court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the Eligibility Certificate dated 31.12.2015, upholding the State's discretion in customizing incentive packages and imposing a time limit on the benefit period. The petitioner's failure to meet the stipulated production targets further justified the denial of the incentives.

---