Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit of additional duty of customs paid on fuel oil, marine gas oil and lubricating oil available on ships imported for breaking was admissible to the ship-breaking unit.
Analysis: The process of obtaining goods and materials by breaking up ships is treated as manufacture under section note 9 of Section XV of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The entire imported ship, including the stores on board, forms the input for the ship-breaking activity. Fuel and oils found on the ship are inevitably removed at the commencement of breaking for safe and efficient operation, and their removal is not a separate activity divorced from the manufacturing process. Credit cannot be denied merely because those items are classifiable separately or because the goods obtained from them are non-excisable. The circular relied upon also supports admissibility of credit on the duty paid on such stores.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on the duty paid on fuel oil, marine gas oil and lubricating oil was admissible, and the department's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order allowing credit was sustained and the revenue appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: In ship-breaking cases, the imported ship along with its onboard stores constitutes the input for the deemed manufacturing process, and Cenvat credit on duty paid on those stores cannot be denied merely because they are separately classifiable or are removed before the main breaking operation.