Limitation under insolvency law runs from open-court pronouncement, and delay beyond the statutory outer limit is not condonable.

Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, limitation for an appeal runs from pronouncement of the order in open court when the record shows the order was made and known on that date. The certified copy's later receipt does not extend the starting point. The appellate forum may condone delay only within the statutory additional fifteen-day period after the initial thirty days; delay beyond that outer limit is jurisdictionally barred and cannot be excused. The stated principle is that court records of pronouncement prevail over collateral material, and appeals filed outside the forty-five-day maximum cannot be entertained on merits.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether limitation for filing the appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code commenced from the date of pronouncement of the order in open court. (ii) Whether delay beyond the statutory outer limit of thirty days plus fifteen days could be condoned.

Issue (i): Whether limitation for filing the appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code commenced from the date of pronouncement of the order in open court.

Analysis: The record of the hearing showed that the impugned order was dismissed on the same date in open court. The Tribunal treated the attendance-cum-order sheet and the entry in the judicial record as conclusive of pronouncement. It also relied on the principle that records of what transpired in court cannot be contradicted by collateral material, and held that the appellant had knowledge of the order on the date of pronouncement. Under the governing insolvency framework, limitation therefore began to run from that date.

Conclusion: The appeal period commenced from the date of pronouncement in open court, namely 11.10.2022, and not from the later date of receipt of the certified copy.

Issue (ii): Whether delay beyond the statutory outer limit of thirty days plus fifteen days could be condoned.

Analysis: The Tribunal applied Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and held that the appellate forum can condone delay only within the further period of fifteen days after expiry of the initial thirty days. Since the appeal papers were filed well after expiry of the total forty-five day period, the delay was beyond the jurisdictional limit and could not be excused on the facts presented.

Conclusion: Delay beyond forty-five days was not condonable, and the condonation application failed.

Final Conclusion: The delay was held to be beyond the permissible statutory limit, so the appeal was not entertained and the challenge to the impugned order could not proceed on merits.

Ratio Decidendi: In appeals under Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, limitation runs from pronouncement of the order, and the appellate tribunal has no power to condone delay beyond the statutory outer limit of fifteen additional days after the initial thirty days.

---