Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether international private bandwidth connectivity availed from a foreign service provider was classifiable as internet telecommunication service or as leased circuit service and telecommunication service, and whether service tax could be levied when the foreign provider was not a telegraph authority.
Analysis: The services were found to be dedicated private bandwidth connectivity, not internet-based services. For the relevant period, such services fell within the statutory categories of leased circuit service and thereafter telecommunication service. The definitions of those taxable services, however, required the provider to answer the description of a telegraph authority, that is, a person licensed under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885. Since the foreign provider had no such licence, the cumulative statutory conditions for levy were not satisfied. The Tribunal followed the earlier coordinate bench ruling on the same legal framework and held that mere provision of the service was insufficient unless the statutory status of telegraph authority was also established.
Conclusion: The demand was not sustainable on merits and service tax was held to be not payable on the impugned services.