Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner could be treated as a non-banking financial company for service tax purposes merely on the basis of its RBI registration, and whether the proposed service tax demand and consequential proceedings could proceed without examining whether its principal business was receiving deposits or lending.
Analysis: Liability under the relevant service tax entry depended not only on registration as a non-banking financial company but also on satisfaction of the statutory definition requiring that the company carry on, as its principal business, the receiving of deposits or lending of money. A registration certificate by itself was held insufficient to establish that condition. The material relied upon by the department and the contents of the show cause notice indicated that the real factual enquiry was whether, during the relevant period, the petitioner's principal business answered that statutory description. That question had to be determined on the basis of material and the petitioner's reply to the notice, rather than by assumption from the registration certificate alone.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not liable to be treated as a non-banking financial company solely because of the RBI registration, and the matter required fresh consideration by the departmental authority on the relevant factual material.