Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellate authority was justified in declining to examine the rectification grievance arising from the processing of the return and in not passing a speaking order on the assessee's claim relating to computation of capital gains and deduction under section 54EC.
Analysis: The return and the accompanying computation disclosed the capital gains working and the claim under section 54EC. The rectification application and the appellate challenge were based on material already available in the return, yet the appellate authority disposed of the matter without examining those facts and without giving reasons. Since the grievance arose from the return itself and the supporting documents, the matter required consideration on merits rather than a bare rejection as beyond the scope of rectification.
Conclusion: The appellate order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the appellate authority for denovo adjudication after granting an opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded to the extent of obtaining remand for fresh consideration, and the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the alleged rectification error is demonstrable from the return and accompanying records, the appellate authority must examine the grievance on merits and pass a reasoned order after hearing the assessee.