Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, when the claim was first made in the revised return filed after the due date and the assessee asserted entitlement to the extended due date on the ground of audit requirements.
Analysis: The revised return was filed after the statutory due date and the assessee had not claimed the deduction in the original return. The assessee also failed to substantiate that its books were audited in a manner attracting the extended due date claimed by it. The statutory bar under section 80AC, read with section 139(1), required filing of the return within the prescribed time as a condition for availing the deduction. A revised return under section 139(5) could cure omission or wrong statement, but it could not be used to make a fresh claim for exemption or deduction not made in the original return. The rejection of rectification was therefore not shown to involve any apparent mistake.
Conclusion: The deduction under section 80P was not allowable, and the assessee's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A deduction that is subject to filing of the return within the due date cannot be claimed for the first time in a revised return filed after that date, and section 139(5) does not permit a fresh claim that was absent from the original return.