Tribunal upholds decision on operational debt admission under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision to admit the Section 9 Application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. It found the operational debt established based on the agreement and non-payment by the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of timely participation and the objective of resolution. The Corporate Debtor's arguments regarding fair opportunity and arbitration clause invocation were rejected, affirming the legality of the Admission Order and initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.

---

---

Issues:
1. Admission of Section 9 Application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
2. Fair opportunity to file a counter by the Corporate Debtor.
3. Invocation of an Arbitration Clause in the Agreement.
4. Legality of the Admission Order dated 05.01.2023.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Admission of Section 9 Application
The Appellant, a Suspended Director of the Corporate Debtor, appealed against the Order admitting the Section 9 Application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Adjudicating Authority found the operational debt due and payable by the Corporate Debtor as established based on the CFA Agreement, invoices, and non-payment by the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal upheld the Authority's decision, dismissing the appeal.

Issue 2: Fair Opportunity to File a Counter
The Corporate Debtor contended that they were not given a fair opportunity to file a counter as the Petition copy was received late, leading to an ex parte Order. The Tribunal examined the Orders of 28.10.2022 and 21.11.2022, where the Corporate Debtor had appeared, but the opportunity to file a counter was closed due to non-compliance. The Tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the impugned order, emphasizing the importance of timely participation.

Issue 3: Invocation of Arbitration Clause
The Appellant argued that the Respondent should have invoked the Arbitration Clause in the CFA Agreement before filing the Section 9 Petition. The Tribunal clarified that the Code's objective is resolution, not recovery, and an Arbitration Clause does not bar an Operational Creditor from filing a Section 9 Petition. The Authority had noted recurring defaults by the Corporate Debtor, justifying the admission of the Application.

Issue 4: Legality of the Admission Order
The Tribunal upheld the legality of the Admission Order dated 05.01.2023, emphasizing the recurring defaults by the Corporate Debtor and the Operational Creditor's request for outstanding dues. Despite the Corporate Debtor's responses and requests, the dues were not paid, leading to the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Tribunal found no illegality or infirmity in the Order and dismissed the appeal.

In conclusion, the Tribunal affirmed the Adjudicating Authority's decision to admit the Section 9 Application, highlighting the importance of timely participation and the Code's objective of resolution. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded, with any pending Interlocutory Applications closed.

---