Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Assessing Officer had jurisdiction to reopen the assessments under Rule 10 of the Central Sales Tax (Orissa) Rules, 1967 for the assessment years 1986-87 and 1987-88.
Analysis: The reopening was examined in the light of the legal position that an order under Section 6A(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 could not be reopened under the State machinery merely to take a different view on the character of the transaction. The subsequent insertion of Section 6A(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 with effect from 8 May 2010 was noted as a later legislative conferral of reassessment power. On the facts of the present case, the reassessment orders were passed for a period when no such power existed. The earlier original assessments had accepted the assessee's claim that the inter-branch transfers were not inter-State sales.
Conclusion: The Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to reopen the assessments, and the question was answered in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reassessment orders were set aside and the original assessment orders were restored.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of a statutory power of reassessment, assessments concluded under Section 6A(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 could not be reopened merely to re-characterise inter-branch transfers, save in cases vitiated by fraud, collusion, misrepresentation, suppression of material facts, or false particulars.