TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court dismisses income tax appeals on transponder lease taxability under Income Tax Act & India-USA DTAA</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation) -2 Versus Intelsat Corporation</h3> Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation) -2 Versus Intelsat Corporation - TMI Issues:Challenging ITAT orders on taxability of amount received for lease of transponder facility under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and India-USA DTAA as royalty.Analysis:The present income tax appeals challenge the ITAT orders for the Assessment Years 2014-15 and 2015-16. The Appellant argues that the ITAT wrongly held that the amount received for the lease of transponder facility by Intelsat Corporation, USA is not taxable under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Article 12(3) of the India-USA DTAA as royalty. The Appellant contends that the ITAT failed to recognize that the amount constitutes income by way of royalty as defined in Explanation 2 and Explanation 5.6 to Section 9(1)(vi) of the Act and Article 12(3) of the DTAA. Additionally, it is argued that the ITAT erred in not acknowledging that the transmission of signals/data through a satellite transponder falls within the definition of the word 'process' in the relevant provisions.The Appellant points out that the questions of law raised in the present appeal align with a previous decision of the Court in the assessee's own case for the Assessment Year 2013-14. In that case, the Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal on similar grounds, relying on precedents such as M/s Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co. Ltd. Vs. DIT and Director of International Taxation Vs. New Skies Satellite BV. The Appellant further notes that the Revenue has challenged these decisions by filing Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) before the Supreme Court.Despite the pending adjudication of the appeals in the aforementioned cases, there is no stay on the judgments. Citing the Supreme Court decisions in Kunhayammed Vs. State of Kerala and Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd. Vs. Church of South India Trust Association, the Court concludes that the issues raised in the present appeals are already covered by the judgment of the predecessor Division Bench. Consequently, the Court finds that no substantial question of law necessitates consideration in the present appeals, leading to their dismissal.
TaxTMI 