Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Board, though a 'State' within Article 12, was a department of the State Government entitled to claim exemption under Notification No. 57/75-C.E. dated 1-3-1975.
Analysis: The exemption notification applied only to goods manufactured by a factory belonging to a State Government for a specified public purpose. The fact that the Board answered the description of 'State' under Article 12 did not make it a department or part of the State Government. A statutory corporation or authority may be 'State' for constitutional purposes without being the Government itself for all purposes.
Conclusion: The Board was not entitled to claim exemption under the notification and this contention failed.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded only to the extent that the impugned demand orders were quashed and the question of liability based on manufacture was remitted for fresh decision; the exemption claim was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: An authority may be 'State' under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, yet it is not for that reason alone a department of the Government for the purpose of a fiscal exemption notification unless the notification clearly extends to it.