Appeal allowed for statistical purposes, remand for refund denial issue of assessment year 1999-2000. Delay condoned, fair opportunity emphasized.

The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal for statistical purposes only, remanding the issue of refund denial for assessment year 1999-2000 back to the Assessing Officer. The delay in filing the revised return was condoned, emphasizing the need to provide the assessee with a fair opportunity to present their case. The ITAT directed the authorities to reconsider the claim, setting aside the previous rejection based on the delay in filing the revised return and failure to claim TDS in the original return.

---

---

Issues:
Refund denial for assessment year 1999-2000 due to TDS not claimed in original return and revised return filed beyond time specified in the Income Tax Act.

Analysis:
1. The appeal was against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-40, Delhi, regarding the denial of a refund of Rs. 4,70,222/- to the DTC Employees Superannuation Pension Trust for the Assessment Year 1999-2000.
2. The assessee filed the return for assessment year 1999-2000 on 30/11/1999 without claiming the refund for tax deducted at source. Subsequently, a revised return was filed on 08.09.2000 claiming the refund.
3. The issue arose when the refund request for assessment year 1999-2000 was rejected by the authorities due to the delay in filing the revised return and TDS not being claimed in the original return.
4. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court directed the Revenue authorities to reconsider the claim. The Assessing Officer rejected the claim citing reasons like TDS not claimed in the original return and the revised return being filed beyond the specified time.
5. The ld.CIT(A) upheld the rejection stating that the claim for refund of tax deducted at source must be made while filing the income tax return, and TDS certificates had to be enclosed with the return as per rules.
6. However, the ITAT Delhi found that the delay in filing the revised return should not be fatal to the claim of refund by the assessee. They condoned the delay of 8/9 months and remanded the issue to the AO for factual verification and appropriate decision.
7. The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal for statistical purposes only, emphasizing that the delay in filing the revised return had been condoned, and the assessee should be given a fair opportunity to present their case.

This detailed analysis highlights the legal proceedings and reasoning behind the judgment, focusing on the denial of the refund for assessment year 1999-2000 and the subsequent decision by the ITAT Delhi to remand the issue for further consideration.

---