Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods falling under the Fourth Schedule to the Central Excise Act, 1944, on which the rate of duty is shown as not leviable, are excluded from the benefit of the Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme under Section 125(1)(h) of the Finance Act, 2019.
Analysis: Section 125(1)(h) excludes persons seeking to make declarations with respect to excisable goods set forth in the Fourth Schedule to the Central Excise Act, 1944. The expression 'excisable goods' was construed in the context of the Scheme and the Board's circular as goods on which central excise duty is actually leviable. The goods in question, though listed in the Fourth Schedule, carried an indication that duty was not leviable, and the additional notes clarified that the dots entry denoted non-leviability of central excise duty. On that basis, the exclusion in Section 125(1)(h) did not apply to the petitioner's product merely because it appeared in the Fourth Schedule.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held eligible to seek the benefit of the Scheme, and the rejection of the applications on the ground of ineligibility was quashed with a direction for fresh processing and reasoned consideration.