Assessee's Appeal Partly Allowed with Adjustments and Deletions on Various Grounds

The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed, with directions for adjustments and deletions on various grounds including transfer pricing adjustments, disallowance of depreciation, disallowances under different sections, and penalty proceedings. The Tribunal granted relief to the assessee on several grounds based on precedents and legal interpretations, directing the AO/TPO to make necessary changes. The judgment was pronounced on 25/11/2022.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Transfer pricing adjustment on account of brokerage commission.
2. Transfer pricing adjustment on account of payment of overseas support fee.
3. Disallowance of depreciation on BSE/NSE membership cards.
4. Disallowance of depreciation on other intangible assets.
5. Addition on account of disallowance under section 40A(2) in respect of payment made to Mr. Ashith Kampani.
6. Disallowance under section 14A.
7. Disallowance on account of transaction charges and lease line charges under section 40(a)(ia).
8. Disallowance on account of lease rental paid for the use of vehicles.
9. Initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c).

Detailed Analysis:

1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment on Account of Brokerage Commission:
The issue pertains to the transfer pricing adjustment of Rs. 22,99,91,344 due to alleged lower commission charged to associated enterprises. The assessee benchmarked the transaction using the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM), but the TPO applied the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to grant a 40% adjustment, following the precedent set in the assessee's own case for the previous year. Ground No. 1.3 was partly allowed, while Ground No. 1.5 was dismissed based on the same precedent. Ground No. 1.4 was allowed for statistical purposes, directing the AO/TPO to grant the benefit of the tolerance range as per section 92C.

2. Transfer Pricing Adjustment on Account of Payment of Overseas Support Fee:
The assessee paid Rs. 3,71,74,349 for overseas support services. The TPO disallowed this payment, but the Tribunal followed the precedent set in the assessee's own case for the previous year, directing the AO/TPO to delete the transfer pricing adjustment. Ground No. 2 was allowed.

3. Disallowance of Depreciation on BSE/NSE Membership Cards:
The assessee claimed depreciation of Rs. 6,70,988 on BSE/NSE memberships, which was disallowed by the AO based on a jurisdictional High Court decision. However, the Tribunal followed the Supreme Court's decision in Techno Shares and Stocks Ltd., directing the AO to allow the depreciation. Ground No. 3 was allowed.

4. Disallowance of Depreciation on Other Intangible Assets:
The assessee claimed depreciation of Rs. 10,45,624 on other intangible assets described as goodwill. The AO disallowed this based on the same High Court decision. The Tribunal, however, noted that the depreciation had been allowed in previous years and followed the Supreme Court's decision, directing the AO to grant the depreciation. Ground No. 4 was allowed.

5. Addition on Account of Disallowance under Section 40A(2) in Respect of Payment Made to Mr. Ashith Kampani:
The AO disallowed Rs. 90,55,400 paid to Mr. Ashith Kampani as it exceeded the limits approved by the Central Government. The Tribunal followed its own precedent, noting that the AO did not provide reasons for the disallowance and that the approval under the Companies Act does not affect the Income Tax Act. Ground No. 5 was allowed.

6. Disallowance under Section 14A:
The AO applied Rule 8D to disallow Rs. 69,04,902 under section 14A. The Tribunal noted that Rule 8D is applicable only from the assessment year 2008-09 and followed its own precedent, restricting the disallowance to Rs. 1 lakh. Ground No. 6 was partly allowed.

7. Disallowance on Account of Transaction Charges and Lease Line Charges under Section 40(a)(ia):
The AO disallowed Rs. 3,04,30,352 paid to BSE/NSE and for VSAT/WAN/leased line charges, considering them as fees for technical services. The Tribunal followed the Supreme Court's decision in Kotak Securities Ltd., holding that these are standard facilities and not technical services, directing the AO to delete the disallowance. Ground No. 7 was allowed.

8. Disallowance on Account of Lease Rental Paid for the Use of Vehicles:
The AO disallowed Rs. 14,61,606 claimed as lease rental for vehicles, treating it as capital expenditure. The Tribunal noted that the lease rentals were allowed in the previous year and that the assessee is not the owner of the leased assets, directing the AO to delete the disallowance. Ground No. 8 was allowed.

9. Initiation of Penalty Proceedings under Section 271(1)(c):
The Tribunal dismissed this ground as premature. Ground No. 9 was dismissed.

Conclusion:
The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed, with directions to the AO/TPO to make adjustments and deletions as specified for each ground. The judgment was pronounced in open court on 25/11/2022.

---