Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (12) TMI 1215 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Estimated profit on undisclosed turnover reduced; separate interest and investment additions deleted, while TDS credit was sent back for verification. Undisclosed bank credits treated as business turnover can justify an estimated profit addition on a reasonable basis, and the Tribunal accepted a lower 4% ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                            Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                              Estimated profit on undisclosed turnover reduced; separate interest and investment additions deleted, while TDS credit was sent back for verification.

                              Undisclosed bank credits treated as business turnover can justify an estimated profit addition on a reasonable basis, and the Tribunal accepted a lower 4% net profit rate on the facts, deleting the balance addition. Once income from the same material was estimated as business profit, a separate addition for undisclosed interest income was unwarranted and was deleted. The Tribunal also deleted the small unexplained investment addition after finding the source explanation and creditworthiness sufficient. TDS credit was not finally allowed on the record and was restored to the Assessing Officer for verification and consequential credit, if due.




                              Issues: (i) Whether the estimated net profit on undisclosed turnover should be reduced from 8% to 4% and the balance addition deleted; (ii) Whether the separate addition for undisclosed interest income was sustainable; (iii) Whether the addition for unexplained investment of Rs. 49,999 was sustainable; (iv) Whether the assessee was entitled to credit for tax deducted at source and restoration of that issue to the Assessing Officer.

                              Issue (i): Whether the estimated net profit on undisclosed turnover should be reduced from 8% to 4% and the balance addition deleted.

                              Analysis: The undisclosed bank credits were treated as business turnover and profit was estimated at 8% by the lower authorities. The Tribunal found that the assessee had claimed to be a commission agent, had filed a consignment agreement, and the facts justified a lower rate than 8%. It also accepted that a portion of the credits belonged to disclosed bank accounts and therefore did not form part of undisclosed turnover. On the facts, a 4% net profit estimate was considered reasonable.

                              Conclusion: The estimated profit was reduced to 4% on the undisclosed turnover, and the remaining addition was deleted, partly in favour of the assessee.

                              Issue (ii): Whether the separate addition for undisclosed interest income was sustainable.

                              Analysis: Once the business income was estimated on the basis of undisclosed turnover, the separate addition for interest income from the same material was held to be unwarranted. The interest component was treated as having no independent survival for addition in the assessment.

                              Conclusion: The addition for undisclosed interest income was deleted, in favour of the assessee.

                              Issue (iii): Whether the addition for unexplained investment of Rs. 49,999 was sustainable.

                              Analysis: The initial funding in the undisclosed bank account was examined in the light of the returned income and the additions already sustained. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficient creditworthiness to explain the source of the investment and that no separate addition was justified on the facts.

                              Conclusion: The addition for unexplained investment was deleted, in favour of the assessee.

                              Issue (iv): Whether the assessee was entitled to credit for tax deducted at source and restoration of that issue to the Assessing Officer.

                              Analysis: The claim for TDS credit required verification of the factual correctness of the tax already deducted and whether proper credit had been granted. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to examine the claim and allow credit if it had not already been given.

                              Conclusion: The issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for verification and appropriate allowance, partly in favour of the assessee.

                              Final Conclusion: The assessment was modified by reducing the estimated business addition, deleting the separate interest and investment additions, and remitting the TDS credit claim for verification, leaving the appeal only partly successful.

                              Ratio Decidendi: Where undisclosed bank credits are treated as business turnover, income may be estimated on a reasonable basis, but separate additions from the same material should not be retained without independent justification, and a supported explanation of source and creditworthiness can defeat a small unexplained investment addition.


                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found