Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an informer who set the adjudicatory process in motion is entitled to obtain a copy of the adjudication order and to be treated as a complainant or an aggrieved person for the purpose of appeal.
Analysis: Under Section 16(3) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, the enquiry can proceed only on a complaint by an officer authorised by the Central Government. Rule 4(11) of the Foreign Exchange Management (Adjudication Proceedings and Appeal) Rules, 2000 provides supply of the adjudication order free of charge to the person against whom the order is made. Section 17 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 therefore confines the right of appeal to a person aggrieved in the statutory sense. The reference to Sections 74, 75 and 76 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 did not alter the statutory scheme governing supply of the adjudication order.
Conclusion: An informer is not a complainant or a person aggrieved under the statutory framework and is not entitled, as of right, to a copy of the adjudication order.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute restricts adjudication complaints to authorised officers and provides supply of the order only to the person against whom it is made, an informer has no statutory entitlement to the order or appellate locus as an aggrieved person.