GST registration and credit utilization queries rejected for not meeting Section 97(2) scope requirements

The AAR Karnataka rejected an application seeking advance ruling on GST matters related to rental/lease business operations. The applicant sought clarification on whether existing registration could continue for new rental business, utilization of Input Tax Credit from Electronic Credit Ledger for manufacturing business to discharge rental GST liability, and use of Electronic Cash Ledger amounts for rental GST obligations. The AAR held that none of these questions fell within the scope of issues specified under Section 97(2) of CGST Act 2017, making the application non-maintainable and liable for rejection under Section 98(2).

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Continuation of existing GSTIN for new business activities.
2. Utilization of balance in Electronic Credit Ledger (Input Tax Credit) for new business activities.
3. Utilization of balance in Cash Ledger for new business activities.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Continuation of Existing GSTIN for New Business Activities:
The applicant sought an advance ruling on whether they can continue with the existing GSTIN to discharge GST liability for rent/lease received from the lessee and for filing returns related to renting/leasing of the premises. The Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax opined that the applicant can continue with the existing GST registration by applying for the requisite amendment indicating the change of Principal Place of Business (PPOB) and business details in their GST registration. However, the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) concluded that the question does not fall under Section 97(2)(f) of the CGST Act, which pertains to whether an applicant is required to be registered, and hence this question cannot be answered.

2. Utilization of Balance in Electronic Credit Ledger (Input Tax Credit) for New Business Activities:
The applicant queried whether they could utilize the balance available in the Electronic Credit Ledger (Input Tax Credit) from their previous business activities (manufacture of granite slabs) to discharge GST liability for rent/lease income. The Assistant Commissioner argued that allowing such utilization would contravene Section 16(1) of the CGST Act, as the input tax credit was availed for a different business activity (manufacture of granite slabs) and not for the new business activity (renting/leasing of commercial immovable property). The AAR also concluded that the question is not covered under the issues specified in Section 97(2) of the CGST Act, which pertains to the admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid until the credit is entered into the Electronic Credit Ledger.

3. Utilization of Balance in Cash Ledger for New Business Activities:
The applicant sought clarification on whether they could utilize the balance in the Cash Ledger to discharge GST liability for rent/lease income. The Assistant Commissioner confirmed that the applicant can utilize the balance in the Cash Ledger as per Section 49(3) of the CGST Act. However, the AAR concluded that this question is also not covered under the issues specified in Section 97(2) of the CGST Act.

Conclusion:
The AAR concluded that the questions raised by the applicant regarding the continuation of existing GSTIN, utilization of balance in Electronic Credit Ledger (Input Tax Credit), and utilization of balance in Cash Ledger for new business activities are not covered under the specified issues in Section 97(2) of the CGST Act. Hence, the application for advance ruling was rejected in terms of Section 98(2) of the CGST Act.

Ruling:
The application filed by the applicant for advance ruling is rejected in terms of Section 98(2) of the CGST Act 2017.

---