Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to inspection of the original documents and supply of legible copies of the relied-upon documents, and consequential extension of time to file a reply to the show cause notice under the PMLA.
Analysis: The petition challenged the inability to file an effective reply because several relied-upon documents supplied with the complaint were illegible or cropped. The Court relied on the principle that the Adjudicating Authority must serve all documents relied upon under Section 8(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, read with Regulation 13(2) of the Adjudicating Authority (Procedure) Regulations, 2013, so that the noticee receives a real and effective opportunity to answer the complaint. It noted that service of the show cause notice alone is insufficient where the documents forming the basis of the proceedings are not properly supplied, and that the hearing under Section 8(2) must be meaningful.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to inspection of the original records and to obtain copies of the relied-upon documents, and the time to file the reply was extended accordingly.
Ratio Decidendi: In proceedings under the PMLA, a noticee must be furnished the relied-upon documents in a legible and usable form, with inspection of originals where necessary, because a meaningful opportunity to reply and be heard depends on proper service of the material relied upon by the Adjudicating Authority.