Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether central excise duty on the textured dyed waste or textured waste was payable at the take-up stage or only when the goods were in finished and marketable condition, and whether the consequential penalty notice could stand.
Analysis: The common controversy in all the petitions was the stage at which excise duty became chargeable. The departmental stand was that duty was recoverable at the take-up stage, while the petitioners relied upon the accepted administrative clarification that duty was payable only when the product had reached the finished and marketable stage. In view of the circular and the trade notice placed before the Court, the departmental objection no longer survived, and the penalty based on alleged non-accounting at the intermediate stage also lacked support.
Conclusion: The duty could not be collected at the take-up stage, and the notices, including the penalty notice, were liable to be quashed.
Final Conclusion: The petitions were allowed and the impugned notices were set aside without costs.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the competent departmental clarification accepts that excise duty is payable only upon the goods reaching a finished and marketable condition, a demand or penalty predicated on collection at an earlier intermediate stage cannot be sustained.