Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        2022 (12) TMI 478 - AT - Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Agreement to sell does not transfer title; project land could remain in the insolvency estate absent conveyance and lessor approval. An agreement to sell does not, by itself, create title or ownership in immovable property, especially where the lease deed restricts transfer unless the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Agreement to sell does not transfer title; project land could remain in the insolvency estate absent conveyance and lessor approval.

                            An agreement to sell does not, by itself, create title or ownership in immovable property, especially where the lease deed restricts transfer unless the unit is functional and prior lessor approval is obtained. Because the appellant had no registered conveyance, no completed construction and no required approval, the project land could be treated as part of the corporate debtor's assets for insolvency purposes. The resolution professional's control over the land was therefore within the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code framework, and the mere pendency of applications seeking exclusion of the land did not by itself invalidate approval of the resolution plan.




                            Issues: (i) whether an agreement to sell conferred ownership rights on the appellant in the project land; (ii) whether the resolution professional acted beyond the statutory framework of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by including the project land in the corporate debtor's assets; and (iii) whether approval of the resolution plan without first disposing of the appellant's pending applications was improper.

                            Issue (i): whether an agreement to sell conferred ownership rights on the appellant in the project land.

                            Analysis: The lease deed restricted transfer or sub-lease of the plot unless the unit was made functional and prior approval of the lessor was obtained. The agreement to sell itself made transfer of title subject to the lease deed and applicable laws, and contemplated execution of transfer documents only after completion of the complex and obtaining occupation certificate. The appellant did not show completion of construction, a registered conveyance, or prior approval from the lessor. An agreement to sell, by itself, does not create title or interest in immovable property.

                            Conclusion: The appellant did not acquire ownership rights in the project land on the basis of the agreement to sell.

                            Issue (ii): whether the resolution professional acted beyond the statutory framework of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by including the project land in the corporate debtor's assets.

                            Analysis: The resolution professional is required to take control and custody of assets over which the corporate debtor has ownership rights and to preserve and protect them during insolvency. The exclusion in the explanation to section 18 applies only to assets owned by a third party while in possession of the corporate debtor under trust or contractual arrangements. Since the appellant had not established ownership of the project land, the resolution professional was justified in treating it as part of the corporate debtor's assets.

                            Conclusion: The inclusion of the project land in the insolvency estate did not breach the statutory scheme of the Code.

                            Issue (iii): whether approval of the resolution plan without first disposing of the appellant's pending applications was improper.

                            Analysis: The pending applications sought exclusion of the project land from the corporate insolvency process, a claim similar to other applications that had been dismissed as belated after approval of the resolution plan by the committee of creditors. The approval order also recorded compliance with the requirements of sections 30 and 31 of the Code and the relevant CIRP Regulations. The mere pendency of the appellant's applications did not, by itself, vitiate the approval of the resolution plan.

                            Conclusion: The approval of the resolution plan was not rendered improper by the non-disposal of the appellant's applications.

                            Final Conclusion: No ground was made out to interfere with approval of the resolution plan, and the challenge to the inclusion of the project land failed in its entirety.

                            Ratio Decidendi: An agreement to sell does not transfer title in immovable property, and absent a registered conveyance and requisite lessor approval, the resolution professional may treat the property as belonging to the corporate debtor for insolvency purposes.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found