Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to be treated as an allottee or homebuyer and to have its claim accepted in Form-CA in the corporate insolvency resolution process.
Analysis: The appellant's original advance to the corporate debtor was a loan. The later unregistered settlement arrangement purporting to allot seven flats was examined against the existing charge in favour of Canara Bank over the entire project, including movable and immovable assets, current and future receivables, and current assets. The record also showed that no no-objection certificate had been obtained from the secured lender, although such consent was required for allotment of flats. In these circumstances, the claimed allotment did not establish a clear right to be treated as an allottee or homebuyer. The arrangement also raised serious doubt as to whether the appellant had acquired the status of a genuine allottee within the meaning of the real estate law.
Conclusion: The appellant was not entitled to be treated as a homebuyer or allottee for filing its claim in Form-CA.
Final Conclusion: The claim was correctly directed to be treated as an ordinary creditor claim, and the order rejecting Form-CA treatment suffered from no infirmity.
Ratio Decidendi: A claimant cannot be treated as a homebuyer or allottee in CIRP on the basis of a purported settlement allotment made in respect of property already subject to a secured lender's charge, particularly where the required no-objection is absent and the claimant is not shown to be a genuine allottee.