TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court dismisses recall application for order due to tax threshold; circular's limits apply to interest cases. Appeal closed for insufficient interest.</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Central Tax, CGST, Delhi East Versus Batra Henlay Cables</h3> Commissioner Of Central Tax, CGST, Delhi East Versus Batra Henlay Cables - TMI Issues:1. Application for recall of order dated 24.08.2022 due to tax effect below threshold limit.2. Interpretation of circular regarding monetary limits for appeals concerning interest on refunds.Analysis:1. The appellant filed an application seeking recall of the order dated 24.08.2022, which closed the appeal due to the tax effect being below the prescribed threshold limit of Rs.1,00,00,000 as per the circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs. The appellant accepted that the tax effect was below the limit but argued that the circular should not apply to matters related to interest on refunded amounts. The circular clarified that monetary limits also apply to cases of refund.2. The case involved the respondent seeking a refund of Rs.25,00,000 deposited during investigation along with interest and the amount from a bank guarantee. After a series of adjudication proceedings and appeals, the Tribunal directed the payment of interest at 12% per annum to the respondent. The appellant appealed against the order on the grounds of interest rate, but the appeal was closed as the quantum of interest fell below the threshold limit for filing an appeal.3. The High Court dismissed the application for recall, noting that the Board declined to file a Special Leave Petition (SLP) due to monetary grounds, keeping the question of law open. The Court agreed with the respondent that the circular encompassed the aspect of interest payable on refunds, as highlighted in the relevant paragraphs of the circular dated 17.08.2011. Therefore, the Court refused to entertain the recall application, and it was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
