Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of assessee on constructive gift claim under section 56(2)(vii)

The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the gift received, though transferred through the son and daughter-in-law, should be considered a constructive gift from the uncle, falling within the exception clause of section 56(2)(vii). The Tribunal found the uncle's confirmation, tax assessment in India, and relationship dynamics supported this interpretation. Consequently, the addition of the gift amount made by the Assessing Officer was deemed unjustified, leading to the deletion of the added amount from the assessee's income.

---

---

Issues:
Confirmation of addition of gift under section 56(2)(vii) as made by the Assessing Officer.

Analysis:
The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai pertained to the Assessment Year 2014-15 and focused on the confirmation of the addition of a gift amounting to Rs.50 lakhs under section 56(2)(vii). The primary contention raised was regarding the nature of the gift and whether it fell within the exceptions provided under the said section. The Assessing Officer had added the gift amount to the assessee's income, citing non-production of evidence regarding the relationship and capacity of the donor. The appellant argued that the gift was a constructive one from the uncle, who was a close relative falling within the exception clause of section 56(2)(vii).

The Assessing Officer had scrutinized the assessee, who was the proprietor of rice mills, and found that the gift was received from the uncle through the uncle's son and daughter-in-law residing abroad. The donor confirmed the gift was out of love and affection for the welfare of the assessee and his family. However, the Assessing Officer raised concerns regarding the lack of evidence regarding the relationship and the genuineness of the transaction. It was held that since the gift was received from the son and daughter-in-law, who did not fall within the definition of 'relative' under section 56(2)(vii), the gift was deemed taxable in the hands of the recipient assessee.

During the appellate proceedings, the assessee contended that the gift was indeed from the uncle and fulfilled the requirements of the exception clause under section 56(2)(vii). The appellant argued that the uncle's financial capacity was substantial as he was assessed to income tax and owned multiple businesses. However, the CIT(A) dismissed the grounds raised by the assessee, stating that mere confirmation by a person falling under the relative category was insufficient to establish the gift as received from the relative within the meaning of the section.

The Appellate Tribunal, after considering the facts and circumstances of the case, concluded that the gift received by the assessee, even though transferred through the son and daughter-in-law, should be construed as a constructive gift from the uncle, who was a close relative falling within the exception clause of section 56(2)(vii). The Tribunal emphasized that the uncle's confirmation, his assessment to tax in India, and the relationship dynamics supported this interpretation. Consequently, the addition made by the Assessing Officer was deemed unjustified, and the Tribunal ordered the deletion of the added amount from the assessee's income.

In the final adjudication, the Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and ordering the deletion of the added gift amount from the income.

---