Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether supply of drill pipes on rental basis, without deputing any operator or expert manpower and with billing linked to actual usage through SES, amounted to taxable supply of tangible goods service on the footing that effective control and possession remained with the supplier.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the drill pipes were supplied for independent use by the recipient and that no engineer, operator, or technically competent person of the appellant was sent along with the pipes. It further held that the mere generation of SES to record actual use did not by itself establish that effective control and possession continued with the appellant. The Tribunal also accepted the appellant's stand that VAT had been paid on the transaction, and found the Revenue's control-based objection unsustainable in the absence of manpower at site.
Conclusion: The activity was not treated as taxable supply of tangible goods service on the Revenue's theory, and the demand was set aside in favour of the assessee.