Tribunal Upholds NCLT Approval Requirement & Orders Fresh Auction for Corporate Debtor

The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision to require NCLT approval for the private sale and consider the higher bid submitted by Jindal Stainless Limited. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the order to conduct a fresh auction to maximize the value of the Corporate Debtor's assets and protect stakeholders' interests.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the private sale conducted by the Liquidator without prior approval of the Adjudicating Authority.
2. Rights of the highest bidder in the limited e-Auction process.
3. Consideration of a higher bid submitted after the limited e-Auction process.
4. Requirement of NCLT approval for the sale of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of the Private Sale Conducted by the Liquidator Without Prior Approval of the Adjudicating Authority:
The Liquidator conducted several e-Auctions for the sale of the Corporate Debtor, all of which failed. Subsequently, a private sale process was initiated. The Liquidator issued a Limited e-Auction Process Information Document for a private sale among three bidders, including the Appellant. The Appellant emerged as the highest bidder with a bid of Rs. 177.50 Crores. The Appellant argued that under Regulation 33 sub-regulation 2 proviso, prior approval of the Adjudicating Authority was not required for the private sale as none of the contingencies (related party, his related party, or any professional appointed by the Liquidator) were applicable.

The Tribunal noted that the Process Information Document and the Letter of Intent (LOI) issued to the Appellant contained specific conditions requiring approval from the NCLT. The terms of the sale, as per Schedule I, Clause 2 of the Liquidation Regulations, stated that the sale shall stand completed in accordance with the terms of sale, which included NCLT approval. Thus, the Tribunal concluded that there was no conflict between the statutory regulations and the terms of the sale requiring NCLT approval.

2. Rights of the Highest Bidder in the Limited e-Auction Process:
The Appellant argued that upon being declared the highest bidder, a vested right accrued in their favor, which could not be taken away by the Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal referenced the Process Information Document, which stated that the issuance of the Auction Document does not imply that the Liquidator is bound to select a Successful Bidder and that all terms and conditions are subject to the directions of the NCLT. The Tribunal also noted that the sale certificate would only be issued upon full payment and NCLT approval.

The Tribunal cited the case of "PNB Sastra Division" where it was held that a successful bidder does not acquire any vested right to enforce the auction until the full payment is made and the sale certificate is issued. Therefore, the Appellant did not acquire any enforceable right merely by being declared the highest bidder.

3. Consideration of a Higher Bid Submitted After the Limited e-Auction Process:
Jindal Stainless Limited submitted a higher bid of Rs. 190 Crores after the limited e-Auction process, which was later revised to Rs. 201 Crores. The Appellant contended that this belated offer should not have been entertained. However, the Tribunal noted that since the sale required NCLT approval, the Adjudicating Authority was within its rights to consider the higher bid to achieve the objective of asset maximization under the IBC.

The Tribunal emphasized that the Adjudicating Authority's decision to direct a fresh auction between the Appellant, Jindal Stainless Limited, and the other two bidders was in line with the objective of maximizing the value of the Corporate Debtor's assets. The Tribunal also noted that the Adjudicating Authority's order protected the Appellant's interests by allowing them to participate in the fresh auction and confirming the sale in their favor if Jindal Stainless Limited failed to fulfill the pre-deposit condition.

4. Requirement of NCLT Approval for the Sale of the Corporate Debtor as a Going Concern:
The Tribunal examined the statutory provisions and the terms of the sale, which required NCLT approval. The Appellant argued that no prior approval was required under Regulation 33(2) for the private sale. However, the Tribunal found that the terms of the sale, as stipulated in the Process Information Document and the LOI, explicitly required NCLT approval. This requirement was consistent with the statutory framework and did not conflict with the IBC or Liquidation Regulations.

The Tribunal concluded that the Adjudicating Authority did not err in requiring NCLT approval for the sale and considering the higher bid submitted by Jindal Stainless Limited. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the Adjudicating Authority's order to conduct a fresh auction and protect the interests of all stakeholders.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision to require NCLT approval for the private sale and consider the higher bid submitted by Jindal Stainless Limited. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of maximizing the value of the Corporate Debtor's assets and ensuring transparency in the liquidation process. The appeal was dismissed, and the order to conduct a fresh auction was affirmed.

---