Court directs Assessing Officer to credit denied TDS amount to assessee, highlighting lack of legal basis.

The court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to credit the denied TDS amount of INR 12,74,469. The judgment emphasized the lack of legal basis to hold the appellant liable for the employer's TDS defaults based on his role as Vice President (Finance). The decision considered relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, CBDT Circular, and Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, concluding that the denial of TDS credit would lead to unjust double taxation, thereby resolving the TDS credit dispute in favor of the assessee.

---

---

Issues:
1. Denial of TDS credit to the assessee by the Assessing Officer.
2. Interpretation of Section 205 of the Income Tax Act and CBDT Circular dated 11.03.2016.
3. Consideration of Form 16 issuance and insolvency resolution plan of the employer.
4. Application of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) provisions.
5. Liability of the assessee as a Vice President (Finance) in the default of TDS deposition.
6. Justification for denying TDS credit to the assessee.

Analysis:
Issue 1: The Assessing Officer denied the TDS credit to the assessee, leading to a tax demand discrepancy. The appellant claimed TDS credit of INR 12,74,469, which was not allowed due to the TDS not reflecting in Form 26AS.

Issue 2: Section 205 of the Income Tax Act and the CBDT Circular were invoked by the assessee to argue against the direct demand of TDS from the assessee. The appellant provided relevant documents like salary slips and bank statements to support the TDS claim.

Issue 3: The discussion involved the non-issuance of Form 16 by the employer, the insolvency resolution plan affecting the employer, and the impact on the TDS credit of the assessee. The appellant contended that denial of TDS credit would result in double taxation.

Issue 4: The application of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) provisions, specifically Section 31(1) and Section 238, was analyzed to determine the binding nature of the resolution plan on the Central Government regarding dues arising under any law.

Issue 5: The liability of the assessee as a Vice President (Finance) in the default of TDS deposition was scrutinized. The argument focused on whether the appellant, in a managerial role, should be held responsible for the employer's TDS defaults.

Issue 6: The judgment highlighted the lack of legal foundation to create a tax liability on the appellant based on his position as Vice President (Finance). The decision favored the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to credit the TDS amount of INR 12,74,469 to the appellant.

The judgment emphasized the legal provisions, factual circumstances, and the responsibilities of the parties involved, ultimately leading to a decision in favor of the assessee regarding the TDS credit dispute.

---