Tribunal clarifies tax treatment for insurance policy maturity amount, adjusts to Rs.3,76,000.

The Tribunal upheld the adjustment made under section 143(1) for the amount received on maturity of the insurance policy, emphasizing the distinction between tax deduction on sums paid under insurance policies and the addition of income for tax purposes. The Tribunal recalculated the adjustment amount to Rs.3,76,000, partially allowing the appeal and ordering the adjustment accordingly.

---

---

Issues:
Confirmation of adjustment made u/s.143(1) for amount received on maturity of insurance policy as per Form No.26AS.

Analysis:
The appeal concerned the confirmation of an adjustment made under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, relating to the amount received on maturity of an insurance policy as reflected in Form No.26AS for the assessment year 2017-18. The adjustment was based on the discrepancy between the income reported by the assessee and the amount shown in Form No.26AS, leading to an increase in the total income by Rs.11,76,000. The assessee contended that the adjustment was incorrect, arguing that section 194DA, which mandates tax deduction at source on sums paid under life insurance policies, refers to "any sum" and not "any income," unlike section 143(1)(a)(vi) which mentions "addition of income." The Tribunal rejected this argument, emphasizing that the purpose of tax deduction at source is to ensure tax compliance on income elements, whether directly received or embedded in the gross sum.

The Tribunal analyzed the relevant provisions of section 194DA, which requires tax deduction on sums paid under life insurance policies, and section 10(10D), which exempts certain sums received under insurance policies from tax. The Tribunal noted that section 10(10D) exempts sums received under insurance policies issued before 31.3.2012 if the premium exceeds 20% of the sum assured. In the case at hand, the insurance policy commenced on 30-08-2011 with a premium exceeding 20% of the sum assured, making the sum received on surrender taxable. The Tribunal clarified that while section 194DA mandates tax deduction on sums paid, section 143(1) requires adjustment for addition of income, not the gross sum.

Further, the Tribunal referred to a CBDT Circular explaining the provisions of section 10(10D), emphasizing that the exemption does not apply if the conditions of clause (c) are met, making the income chargeable to tax. The Circular specified that the taxable income is the sum received reduced by the premium paid. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that only the income component, not the gross sum, should be subject to adjustment under section 143(1). In the present case, considering the premium paid and the sum received, the Tribunal recalculated the adjustment amount to be Rs.3,76,000, partially allowing the appeal and ordering the adjustment accordingly.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the adjustment made under section 143(1) for the amount received on maturity of the insurance policy, emphasizing the distinction between tax deduction on sums paid under insurance policies and the addition of income for tax purposes. The Tribunal's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the relevant provisions and the specific circumstances of the case, resulting in a recalculated adjustment amount based on the income component.

---