Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether almonds imported under a REP licence could be treated as seeds and thereby held to be covered by the licence, and whether the Customs authorities exceeded their jurisdiction in examining the nature and classification of the goods.
Analysis: The licence permitted import of seeds, bulbs, mother plant, germ plasm and related items for replenishment of exports of fresh fruits, vegetables and flowers. The Customs tariff classification was decisive: almonds were specifically classifiable under Chapter 8 as in-shell or shelled almonds, while Chapter 12 covered seeds and expressly excluded goods falling under heading 08.02. The import documents themselves described the goods as almonds in-shell. The Court held that the Customs authorities were entitled to determine whether the goods corresponded to the licence description and that their enquiry did not amount to an intrusion into the Licensing Authority's sphere. The commercial and botanical materials relied upon by the importer could not displace the clear tariff classification.
Conclusion: The imported almonds were not covered by the REP licences, the confiscation and penalty were sustained, and the challenge failed.