Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (10) TMI 375 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal mandates internal TNMM for IT sector transfer pricing, emphasizing data accuracy The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to adopt internal Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) for ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal mandates internal TNMM for IT sector transfer pricing, emphasizing data accuracy

                            The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to adopt internal Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) for benchmarking international transactions in the IT enabled services sector. The decision emphasized the importance of using internal TNMM for assessing arm's length prices, highlighting the reliability and accuracy of financial data for such analysis. The Tribunal's ruling provided clarity on transfer pricing assessments, ensuring fair and reasonable determinations in related party transactions.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Transfer pricing adjustment in international transactions for A.Y. 2013-14.
                            2. Jurisdictional error in reference to Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO).
                            3. Application of TNMM for benchmarking international transactions.
                            4. Rejection of internal TNMM by authorities.
                            5. Rejection of segmental accounts by authorities.
                            6. Application of external TNMM and RPT filter.
                            7. Treatment of overdue receivables as international transactions.
                            8. Methodology of ALP for alleged international transaction of receivables.
                            9. Initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act.

                            Analysis:

                            1. The appeal was against the order of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax regarding transfer pricing adjustments in international transactions for A.Y. 2013-14. The case involved the assessee company engaged in IT enabled services, with scrutiny initiated due to international transactions with Associated Enterprises (AEs) as per Section 92B of the I.T. Act, 1961. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) determined an ALP adjustment of Rs.60,94,597, which was later reduced to Rs.49,33,499 by the Disputes Resolution Panel (DRP). The final assessment determined the total income at Rs.1,82,24,622 under section 143(3) r.w.s.144C of the I.T. Act, 1961.

                            2. The grounds of appeal raised various issues including jurisdictional errors in the reference to the TPO, rejection of internal TNMM, segmental accounts, application of external TNMM, RPT filter, treatment of overdue receivables, ALP methodology, and penalty proceedings. The Tribunal dismissed some grounds not pressed during the hearing and found that the issue of adopting internal TNMM was covered by a previous Tribunal decision, directing the TPO/A.O. to adopt internal TNMM for benchmarking provision of IT enabled services.

                            3. The Tribunal noted that the nature of services rendered by the assessee to AEs and non-AEs broadly comprised customer care and technical support falling under the ITeS Industry. Rejecting the internal TNMM was deemed invalid as it facilitates finding comparable companies and determining the arm's length nature of transactions. The Tribunal directed the TPO/A.O. to adopt internal TNMM based on the reliability and accuracy of financial data pertaining to internal segmentation.

                            4. As the Tribunal had already accepted the grounds related to internal TNMM, the issues concerning the application of external TNMM and RPT filter were considered infructuous and dismissed. The appeal was partly allowed based on the directions given regarding the adoption of internal TNMM for benchmarking international transactions in the IT enabled services sector.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal's decision highlighted the importance of adopting internal TNMM for benchmarking international transactions in the IT enabled services industry, emphasizing the reliability and accuracy of financial data for such analysis. The judgment provided clarity on the methodology to be applied in transfer pricing assessments, ensuring a fair and reasonable determination of arm's length prices in related party transactions.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found