Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest could be awarded on excise duty refunded to the assessee by exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Analysis: The refund claim arose under the statutory scheme governing excise duty, and the relevant enactment and rules did not provide for payment of interest on refund. The Court held that the omission to provide for interest was deliberate, and that the excise authorities, being bound by the statute and the rules, had no inherent power to award interest. The Court further held that, even assuming that writ jurisdiction could in an appropriate case be used to grant interest on equitable grounds, such relief was not automatic and depended on the facts establishing special equity. On the facts, there was no unreasonable delay in effecting refund after the appellate proceedings, no pleaded or proved circumstance justifying equitable relief, and the petitioner had not shown any actual loss warranting compensation by way of interest.
Conclusion: Interest on the refunded excise duty was not payable, and the claim for such relief failed.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was dismissed because no equitable or legal basis was made out for awarding interest on the refunded duty.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of a statutory provision for interest on excise-duty refund, interest is not to be awarded as a matter of course under writ jurisdiction and can be granted only where special facts create a clear equitable entitlement.