Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to interest on excise duty recovered and retained without authority of law, and if so, at what rate and for what period.
Analysis: The duty had been collected on a basis later held to be without jurisdiction, and the refund was made only after a substantial delay. Interest was treated as compensation for the use or retention of another's money. The absence of an express provision in the statute or rules was not accepted as a bar where the levy itself was unauthorized and the Department had retained the amount for a long period. The equitable principle that public bodies must restore money wrongly recovered supported award of interest.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to interest at 12% per annum from the date of collection of the amount until the date of actual refund.