Limitation under insolvency law extends through acknowledgements of liability, and proved financial debt and default justify CIRP admission.

Repeated acknowledgements of liability in balance sheets, revival letters and balance confirmations extend limitation under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, so a section 7 application is not time-barred on the basis of the original default date alone. The record also showed sanction and enhancement of credit facilities, execution of loan and security documents, and admission of liability by the corporate debtor, establishing financial debt and default. On that basis, the adjudicating authority found the statutory threshold satisfied, rejected the stamping objection as not displacing the debt or default, and held the application admissible for commencement of the corporate insolvency resolution process.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the section 7 application was barred by limitation in view of the date of default and the alleged acknowledgements in the corporate debtor's balance sheets and revival letters; (ii) Whether financial debt and default were established so as to warrant admission of the application and commencement of the corporate insolvency resolution process.

Issue (i): Whether the section 7 application was barred by limitation in view of the date of default and the alleged acknowledgements in the corporate debtor's balance sheets and revival letters.

Analysis: The corporate debtor relied on the date of NPA to contend that the petition was time-barred. The record, however, showed repeated acknowledgements of the liability in the balance sheets, apart from revival letters and balance confirmation. Such acknowledgements extended the period of limitation within the meaning of section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

Conclusion: The application was not barred by limitation and the objection on this ground failed.

Issue (ii): Whether financial debt and default were established so as to warrant admission of the application and commencement of the corporate insolvency resolution process.

Analysis: The documents on record showed sanction and enhancement of credit facilities, execution of loan and security documents, and admission of liability by the corporate debtor. The adjudicating authority found that the debt exceeded the statutory threshold and that default was established, leaving no reason to refuse admission under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The objections regarding stamping were not accepted as displacing the debt or default shown on the record.

Conclusion: Financial debt and default were proved, and the application was liable to be admitted for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process.

Final Conclusion: The corporate debtor's objection on limitation failed, the debt and default stood established, and insolvency proceedings were directed to commence with moratorium and appointment of an interim resolution professional.

Ratio Decidendi: Repeated acknowledgements of liability in balance sheets and connected documents extend limitation under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and where financial debt and default are otherwise established, a section 7 application is admissible for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process.

---