Insolvency recovery restraint on corporate debtor bank account set aside where admitted claims conflicted with priority framework.

Recovery attachment, lien and prohibitory orders against a corporate debtor's bank account could not be continued during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process once the tax and provident fund claims had been admitted. The NCLT held that such restraints were inconsistent with the insolvency distribution framework, including the priority structure under section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which governs treatment of workmen's dues and government dues in liquidation. On that basis, the application succeeded and the authorities' recovery measures were set aside, with the bank account to be released for control during the insolvency process.

---

---

Issues: Whether the attachment, lien and prohibitory orders issued by the tax and provident fund authorities over the corporate debtor's bank account were liable to be set aside during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.

Analysis: The application arose in the course of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, during which claims of the concerned authorities had been admitted. The decision turned on the distributional priority under section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which accords statutory priority to workmen's dues and government dues in the liquidation waterfall. In view of the admitted claims and the statutory framework governing insolvency, continuation of recovery attachment over the bank account was found impermissible for the purposes sought in the application.

Conclusion: The attachment, lien and prohibitory orders were set aside and the bank account was to be released for control during the insolvency process.

Final Conclusion: The application succeeded, and the recovery restraints imposed by the authorities could not be continued against the corporate debtor's bank account.

Ratio Decidendi: Once claims are admitted in insolvency proceedings, recovery measures inconsistent with the priority framework under section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 cannot be continued against the corporate debtor's assets.

---