Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether GST was payable on the monthly licence fee charged for the work contract for maintenance of toilets at the bus station, in view of the exemption notifications covering services by way of public conveniences.
Analysis: The service in question fell within Heading 9994 relating to services by way of public conveniences such as bathroom, washroom, lavatory, urinal or toilets, for which the central notification prescribed a nil rate. A similar exemption was also issued by the State Government. As both notifications remained in force and no later notification was shown to have overridden them, the demand of GST on the monthly licence fee could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The GST demand on the monthly licence fee was illegal and improper, and the issue was answered in favour of the petitioner.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was allowed and the impugned tax demand was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a service squarely falls within an operative exemption notification prescribing nil tax, and no subsequent overriding notification exists, tax cannot be demanded on that service.