Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a co-operative bank was entitled to deduction under the second limb of section 36(1)(viia) in respect of 10% of the aggregate average advances made by its rural branches, and whether the claim required verification of banking licence status and computation details.
Analysis: The amended text of section 36(1)(viia) was read as extending the deduction to eligible co-operative banks, and the expression "such bank" in the second limb was treated as referring back to the banks covered by the first limb. The manner of computation prescribed in Rule 6ABA was not read so narrowly as to defeat the statutory benefit. At the same time, the record did not conclusively establish whether the assessee held a valid RBI banking licence for the relevant year and whether the computation of rural-branch advances had been properly furnished and verified. The matter therefore required factual verification by the Assessing Officer before the deduction could be finally quantified and granted.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled in principle to claim deduction under the second limb of section 36(1)(viia), but the allowance was made subject to verification by the Assessing Officer of the banking licence, the statutory status of the co-operative bank, and the computation of the qualifying rural-branch advances.