Tribunal initiates CIRP against Corporate Debtor for defaulting on loan agreement.

The Tribunal admitted the Company Petition and initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor for defaulting on a short-term loan agreement, leading to a debt of Rs. 17,84,219. Evidence including the Loan Agreement and correspondence proved the debt and default, satisfying Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Mr. Kairav Trivedi was appointed as Interim Resolution Professional, with various directions issued for the CIRP process.

---

---

Issues:
1. Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Corporate Debtor for default in payment to Financial Creditor.

Detailed Analysis:
1. The Financial Creditor filed a Company Petition seeking to initiate CIRP against the Corporate Debtor under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, alleging default in payment of Rs. 17,84,219 along with interest. The debt arose from a short-term loan agreement dated 20th July 2011, where the Corporate Debtor failed to repay the loan amount and created security over an immovable property. Despite various negotiations and acknowledgments of outstanding amounts, the Corporate Debtor failed to repay the debt, leading to the initiation of the CIRP.

2. The Tribunal examined the evidence presented, including the Loan Agreement, Ledger Accounts, and correspondence between the parties. The Financial Creditor successfully established the existence of the debt and default by the Corporate Debtor. The talks regarding the settlement and allotment of a new property broke down, and there was no repayment of the outstanding amount till the date of the petition. The Tribunal found the debt and default to be proven beyond doubt, satisfying the requirements for admission under Section 7 of the Code.

3. Consequently, the Tribunal admitted the Company Petition and ordered the initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor. Mr. Kairav Trivedi was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional, and the Financial Creditor was directed to deposit an amount towards the initial CIRP cost. Various prohibitions and directions were issued, including the moratorium period, management vesting in the IRP/RP, and public announcement of the CIRP process. The Tribunal directed the Registry to communicate the order to both parties and the IRP promptly.

This detailed analysis outlines the legal proceedings, evidence, and findings leading to the admission of the Company Petition and the initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor based on the default in payment to the Financial Creditor.

---