Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was correctly treated as the manufacturer of paper cut to size at the PCS unit and, as a result, was entitled to retain registration, take Modvat/Cenvat credit on duty paid paper reels, and discharge duty on reams through such credit.
Analysis: The findings accepted that the PCS unit was under the control of the assessee, that the raw material remained its property, and that earlier decisions had already treated cutting and slitting of reels as not altering the settled position in the assessee's favour. On that basis, the assessee was regarded as the real manufacturer for excise purposes, so the registration could not be withdrawn and the credit taken on duty paid reels was not barred. Once the credit was held admissible, the connected proposals for recovery, interest, penalty and confiscation also could not survive.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee. The appeal challenging the order granting relief to the assessee failed.