Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disallowance made under section 14A read with Rule 8D, for assessment years 2011-12 and 2013-14, was sustainable in the absence of adequate recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer and in the facts that the assessee had maintained separate accounts and had not claimed the relevant personal expenditure as deduction.
Analysis: Section 14A permits disallowance only where the Assessing Officer, having regard to the accounts, is not satisfied with the correctness of the assessee's claim in relation to expenditure incurred for earning income not includible in total income. The prerequisite is not a bare disagreement, but a reasoned satisfaction based on the accounts. In the present matter, the assessee had separate business and personal accounts, and the expenditure incurred in the personal account was not claimed as a deduction. The disallowance was nevertheless made by applying Rule 8D without a convincing basis, and the Assessing Officer also did not satisfactorily justify rejection of the assessee's own working for the relevant year.
Conclusion: The disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D was not justified and was directed to be deleted. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D can be sustained only when the Assessing Officer records a reasoned dissatisfaction with the assessee's claim after examining the accounts; absent such satisfaction, the disallowance cannot stand.