Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether bidi falls within the expression "tobacco and tobacco products" in Entry 16 of Part I of the Schedule to the Orissa Entry Tax Act; (ii) Whether penalty was sustainable for non-payment of entry tax on bidi.
Issue (i): Whether bidi falls within the expression "tobacco and tobacco products" in Entry 16 of Part I of the Schedule to the Orissa Entry Tax Act.
Analysis: The expression in the Schedule was construed by applying the common commercial parlance and trade-use approach. Bidi was treated as a tobacco-based product used and understood in ordinary market usage, and the absence of an express entry for bidi was held not to exclude it from the wider description "tobacco products".
Conclusion: The issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether penalty was sustainable for non-payment of entry tax on bidi.
Analysis: Once bidi was held to be a scheduled good exigible to entry tax, the statutory penalty provision for non-payment was applied. The penalty was treated as mandatory on the facts found by the Tribunal.
Conclusion: The issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: Bidi was held to be covered by the relevant schedule entry for tobacco and tobacco products, and the levy of tax and consequential penalty were sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tariff or schedule entry uses broad commercial expressions, classification is determined by common parlance, and a product understood in trade as a tobacco product may be included even without specific nomenclature in the schedule.