Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        2022 (7) TMI 879 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Admits CIRP Petition against Kaytx Industries The tribunal admitted the petition for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor, M/s. Kaytx Industries ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Tribunal Admits CIRP Petition against Kaytx Industries

                              The tribunal admitted the petition for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor, M/s. Kaytx Industries Private Limited. Mr. Aditya Kumar was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), and a moratorium was declared effective until the completion of the CIRP or approval of a resolution plan. The petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. 1,00,000 with the IRP to cover immediate CIRP expenses.




                              Issues Involved:
                              1. Proper service of demand notice.
                              2. Existence of a pre-existing dispute.
                              3. Timeliness of the petition within the limitation period.
                              4. Completeness of the petition.
                              5. Satisfaction of conditions under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
                              6. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).
                              7. Declaration of moratorium.

                              Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                              1. Proper Service of Demand Notice:
                              The tribunal examined whether the demand notice dated 06.11.2018 was properly served. It was found that the demand notice was duly served upon the respondent as per the tracking report. The respondent's submissions were contradictory, claiming both non-receipt and defectiveness of the notice. The tribunal concluded that the demand notice was properly served and signed by an authorized partner of the petitioner, making the respondent's objections invalid.

                              2. Existence of a Pre-existing Dispute:
                              The tribunal considered whether there was a pre-existing dispute regarding the operational debt. The petitioner claimed no reply was received to the demand notice. The respondent failed to show any pending dispute in any court or authority regarding the alleged sub-standard quality of supplied materials. The tribunal inferred from the affidavit under Section 9(3)(b) of the IBC that there was no pre-existing dispute related to the debt claimed.

                              3. Timeliness of the Petition within Limitation:
                              The tribunal assessed if the petition was filed within the limitation period. The demand notice dated 06.11.2018 was served, and no reply or payment was made by the corporate debtor. Thus, the limitation period began from the date of default, 17.05.2018. The petition filed on 07.01.2019 was deemed within the limitation period.

                              4. Completeness of the Petition:
                              The tribunal reviewed the contents of the petition filed in Form 5 and found it complete. The unpaid operational debt amounted to Rs. 74,02,917.00, inclusive of 24% interest per annum. The operational creditor provided necessary documents, including invoices, ledger accounts, and statutory notice, proving the debt and default.

                              5. Satisfaction of Conditions under Section 9 of the IBC:
                              The tribunal confirmed that the conditions under Section 9 of the IBC were satisfied. The operational creditor proved the debt and default, which exceeded the threshold limit of one lakh rupees (prior to the amendment increasing the threshold to one crore rupees). The petition met all requirements, leading to its admission for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).

                              6. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP):
                              The tribunal appointed Mr. Aditya Kumar as the IRP, confirming his credentials and absence of any adverse records. The tribunal directed the IRP to undertake responsibilities as per the IBC, including taking control of the corporate debtor's assets, making a public announcement, and constituting a Committee of Creditors.

                              7. Declaration of Moratorium:
                              The tribunal declared a moratorium effective from the date of the order until the completion of the CIRP or approval of a resolution plan. The moratorium included suspension of suits, transfer of assets, enforcement of security interests, and recovery of property. Essential goods and services to the corporate debtor were to remain uninterrupted during the moratorium period.

                              Conclusion:
                              The tribunal admitted the petition for initiating the CIRP against the corporate debtor, M/s. Kaytx Industries Private Limited, and appointed Mr. Aditya Kumar as the IRP. A moratorium was declared, and the petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. 1,00,000 with the IRP to cover immediate CIRP expenses.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found