Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned adjudication order and the underlying show-cause notices could be sustained when the notices were adjudicated after an inordinate delay and the order failed to deal with prior contrary orders and the plea of stale proceedings.
Analysis: The challenge was founded on prolonged inaction in adjudicating the show-cause notices, which had remained pending for nearly two decades. The record showed that the delay was attributable to the revenue and not to the assessee. The adjudicating authority failed to consider the earlier orders passed by superior departmental authorities taking a contrary view, and also omitted to deal with the contention that such belated adjudication rendered the notices stale. In fiscal matters, where no rigid limitation period is prescribed, adjudicatory power must still be exercised within a reasonable time. Excessive and unexplained delay defeats the purpose of issuing a show-cause notice, prejudices the assessee's ability to defend, and offends procedural fairness and natural justice.
Conclusion: The impugned adjudication could not be sustained. The delayed resurrection of the notices was held impermissible, and the order was quashed.
Final Conclusion: Belated adjudication of long-pending show-cause notices, when wholly attributable to the revenue and unsupported by a lawful justification, is invalid and liable to be set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Even where no statutory limitation period is prescribed, fiscal authorities must adjudicate show-cause notices within a reasonable time, and inordinate unexplained delay causing prejudice to the noticee violates procedural fairness and natural justice.