Tribunal reverses penalty for tax default on textiles company due to invalid return

The Tribunal reversed the penalty imposed under Section 221(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the Assessee, a textiles manufacturing company, for alleged default in payment of self-assessment tax. The Tribunal held that penalties based on an invalid return were not sustainable, as the Assessee cannot be considered an 'assessee in default' without a valid return under Section 139. The penalty was overturned, with the Tribunal allowing grounds 1 to 4 of the appeal and dismissing ground 5. The order was pronounced on 07.07.2022.

---

---

Issues:
Penalty under Section 221(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for default in payment of self-assessment tax.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed against the order confirming the penalty levied under Section 221(1) of the Act. The Assessee's grounds of appeal included contentions regarding the alleged default in payment of self-assessment tax, being an 'assessee in default' under Section 140A, and the applicability of penalty post-amendment. The Assessee, a textiles manufacturing company, filed its return of income but failed to rectify defects, leading to invalidation of the return. The Assessing Officer issued a notice for non-payment of taxes, which the Assessee contested, claiming the self-assessment tax was paid. The Assessing Officer imposed a penalty, citing intentional wrong claims and irresponsibility by the Assessee. The CIT (A) upheld the penalty, leading to the Assessee's appeal.

The Assessee argued that the penalty based on an invalid return was unjustified, as the return filed under Section 139(4) did not have default in tax payment. The Departmental Representative supported the lower authorities' orders, emphasizing the defective original return and subsequent non-payment of due taxes. The Tribunal examined the sequence of events, noting the invalidation of the original return and the subsequent filing of a valid return under Section 139(4). The Tribunal found the Assessing Officer's assertion of a revised return on 19/1/2018 to be incorrect, as the return was still considered original by the Assessee. It concluded that penalties based on an invalid return were not sustainable, as the Assessee cannot be held 'assessee in default' without a valid return under Section 139. The Tribunal highlighted the discrepancy in treating a defective return as a failure to furnish and initiating penalties for non-payment, leading to the reversal of the penalty imposed.

The Tribunal allowed grounds 1 to 4, reversing the penalty imposed under Section 221(1) of the Act. Ground 5 was dismissed due to the lack of arguments presented. The appeal was partly allowed, with the order pronounced on 07.07.2022.

---